Welcome to the another installment of DON'T WATCH
THIS ALONE!, where we review the best, worst, and everything in
between in the world of horror. This week we review the David Fincher home
invasion thriller PANIC ROOM.
Panic Room is a
2002 home invasion thriller directed by highly acclaimed director David
Fincher. The film centers around a mother and daughter who move into a new
condo in New York with a high security “panic room” meant to keep them safe
from invaders. Later that night their home is broken into and we learn there is
more to the panic room than first meets the eye. The film stars Jodie Foster,
Kristen Stewart, Forest Whitaker, Dwight Yoakam, Patrick Bauchau, and Jared
Leto.
Panic Room is
definitely not Fincher’s strongest work. Not by a long shot. That said this is
still a very compelling thriller with interesting characters, good acting, and
a solid simple premise. The film often zagged into situations that were
exceedingly over the top and convoluted, however, and there are moments in the
film that are so bad they take you out of all the tension you felt earlier (or,
at least one).
Beginning with the notable positives, I think the biggest
strength is the brilliant direction and tension building throughout the film. It
goes without saying that David Fincher is an incredibly skilled director. Over
the course of his illustrious career he has crafted many thrillers with
incredible amounts of well-developed tension. Panic Room is no exception. He knows exactly how to set up a
situation and to systematically move through a series of steps that
consistently sustains audience engagement throughout and has them glued to the
screen. This is a wildly difficult thing to do and this pulls it off handily.
In addition to the incredible direction, the film has very
interesting characters. The mother and daughter in the story don’t initially
seem like they were anything special, but as the story unfolds you begin to
understand their relationship and the caretaking position the mother is in.
This is incredibly impactful and gave both Jodie Foster and Kristen Stewart a
lot of characterization to chew on as they deliver two incredibly solid
performances.
This is a pretty unique home invasion thriller, however,
because it also gives solid time and characterization to the villains in the
story. Forest Whitaker and Jared Leto, in particular, deliver impeccable
performances and make you sympathize with them even when they do awful things
to our protagonists. This is a powerful thing for a film like this to do and
certainly elevates it above most of its competition.
Finally, the central conceit for the film is really
incredibly laid out an executed. Fincher uses such a simple tool with this
panic room in the house to create incredible thrills and drama. By playing out
consistent counter-narratives between people inside the panic room and people
outside, there is always this interesting push and pull that makes the film
very exciting to watch. Sometimes films are complicated and successful as a
result, but the genius of Panic Room
is that it is ultimately a very small movie that delivers big emotions because
it is has a very intelligently constructed foundation.
Panic Room has
some notable issues, however. It shifts the story in odd ways that almost feel
like they’re meant to manufacture drama rather than let it out naturally. There
is some weird argumentation between the invaders, for example, that just felt
like it was from a totally different movie. Further, the film eventually
introduces some external factors that expand the story and every time this
happened the film was worse.
Additionally, there is one scene (and arguably a second)
that is so laughably terrible it totally removes you from the film. Neither is
a result of the story or performance, but both are several steps more absurd
than the premise for this movie can bear. One is also coupled with unbelievably
bad CGI that left me questioning how a perfectionist like David Fincher could
ever have ok’d it.
Overall, I think Panic
Room is a good movie that shows the skills of a masterful director. It is
lesser in the scope of his entire filmography, however, as it is one of the few
films that has awful moments coupled with the exceedingly successful setup overall.
Ryan’s Score: 7.5/10
No comments:
Post a Comment